Ethnicities

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Ethnicities, Vol. 4, No. 3, 337-355 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1468796804045238

Unyielding Positions

A Critique of the ‘Race’ Debate

Claire Jean Kim

University of California, Irvine, USA

What are the implications of the social constructionist insight about race for the political struggle against racism? This question has sparked a vigorous cross-disciplinary debate. At issue is whether the struggle to contain the damage done by racism is best served by rejecting the concept of race altogether, rehabilitating it, or partially dismantling it. I aim to accomplish three tasks here. The first is to provide a much-needed overview of this debate about race and essentialism. Second, I advance a critique of this debate, arguing that the main participants in this debate commit a shared error: they implicitly advance a binary white/non-white framework that falsely homogenizes the experiences of non-white groups and obscures the fact that differential racialization processes have generated a complex structure of multiple group positions in American society. Finally, I conclude by considering what strategies progressive scholars might employ in challenging the differential positioning of racialized groups.

Key Words: anti-racism • essentialism • positionality • social construction


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EthnicitiesHome page
B. Shah
`Is yellow black or white?': Inter-minority relations and the prospects for cross-racial coalitions between Laotians and African Americans in the San Francisco Bay Area
Ethnicities, December 1, 2008; 8(4): 463 - 491.
[Abstract] [PDF]