This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lægaard, S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Normative interpretations of diversity

The Muhammad cartoons controversy and the importance of context

University of Copenhagen, Denmark, laegaard{at}hum.ku.dk

Normative interpretations of particular cases consist of normative principles or values coupled with social theoretical accounts of the empirical facts of the case. The article reviews the most prominent normative interpretations of the Muhammad cartoons controversy over the publication of drawings of the Prophet Muhammad in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten. The controversy was seen as a case of freedom of expression, toleration, racism, (in)civility and (dis)respect, and the article notes different understandings of these principles and how the application of them to the controversy implied different social theoretical accounts of the case. In disagreements between different normative interpretations, appeals are often made to the ‘context’, so it is also considered what roles ‘context’ might play in debates over normative interpretations.

Key Words: civility • Danish cartoons • diversity • freedom of expression • Muhammad • multiculturalism • racism • respect • toleration

Ethnicities, Vol. 9, No. 3, 314-333 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1468796809337425


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?