This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Coene, G. Articles by Longman, C. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Gendering the diversification of diversity

The Belgian hijab (in) question

Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium, gcoene{at}vub.ac.be

Chia Longman

Ghent University, Belgium, chia.longman{at}ugent.be

This article presents an analysis of the recent headscarf debate in Belgium, and explores in particular to what extent issues of gender equality and feminist arguments were central to the discussion. It is argued that compared to France, concerns about secularity and state-neutrality, national identity and equality, all find resonance in the Belgian context, but are articulated in a more ambiguous and less `principled' way. This partly explains the paradoxical situation in which, despite a widespread resistance to a general law banning the wearing of religious symbols in public schools, in practice, headscarf prohibitions are on the rise throughout various regions of the country. Although issues of gender equality and cultural diversity often cut and flow across debates and policies in European nation states, the Belgian hijab question provides a unique case, because of various lines of fracture and processes of increasing diversification that characterize Belgian society.

Key Words: gender equality • headscarves • multiculturalism • national identity • neutrality of the state • public education

References

• Abicht, L. (2006) `Actief Pluralisme. Zeven stellingen' (Active pluralism: Seven propositions), in E. Brems and R. Stockx (eds) Recht en minderheden. De ene diversiteit is de andere niet, pp. 221-33, Tegenspraak-cahier 26. Brugge: die Keure.
• Abu-Lughod, L. (2002) `Do Muslim Women really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and its Others', American Anthropologist 104(3): 783-90.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Ahmed, L. (1992) Women and Gender in Islam: Historical Roots of a Modern Debate. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
• Al Ma'rifa (De Kennis) v.z.w. (2004) `Onderzoeksrapport "Het dragen van de hoofddoek: vrije keuze of dwang?"' (Research report `Wearing the headscarf: free choice or coercion?'). Brussels, April-Juni, 2004.
• Amiraux, V. (2003) `Discours voilés sur les musulmanes en Europe: comment les musulmanes sont-ils devenues des musulmanes?' (Veiled discourse on Muslims in Europe: How did Muslims become Muslims?), Social Compass 50(1): 85-96.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• AMV (2005) `AMV Enquête rond de hoofddoek' (AMV survey on the headscarf), Vooruit! Driemaandelijks tijdschrift van het AMV 1(2): 25-28.
• Babazia, B. and J. Perneel, eds (2006) De sluier opgelicht: Meisjes met en zonder hoofddoek in de klas: handvatten voor leerkrachten en directies (The veil unveiled: Girls with and without the headscarf in the classroom: Tools for teachers and school boards). Brussels: SAMV.
• Bartels, E. (2005) `"Wearing a Headscarf is My Personal Choice" (Jasmina, 16 years)', Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations 16(1): 15-28.[CrossRef]
• Baas Over Eigen Hoofd (BOEH!) (n.d.) Website [http://www.baasovereigenhoofd.be/].
• Blijf van mijn hoofddoek (2007) Website [ http://www.blijfvanmijnhoofddoek.be/].
• Bousetta, H. and D. Jacobs (2006) `Multiculturalism, citizenship and Islam in problematic encounters in Belgium', in T. Modood, A. Triandafyllidou and R. Zapata-Barrero (eds) Multiculturalism, Muslims and Citizenship. A European Approach, pp. 23-36. London: Routledge.
• Brems, E. (2004) `De hoofddoek als constitutionele kopzorg' (The headscarf as a constitutional issue), Tijdschrift voor Bestuurswetenschappen en Publiekrecht 6: 323-60
• Brems, E. (2006) `De ene diversiteit is de andere niet' (One kind of diversity is not the other), in E. Brems and R. Stockx (eds) Recht en minderheden. De ene diversiteit is de andere niet, pp. 1-21, Tegenspraak-cahier 26. Brugge: die Keure.
• CID (2005) `Commissie voor Interculturele Dialoog. Eindverslag en getuigenissen. Overhandigd aan de Minister van Gelijke Kansen, Sociale Integratie en Interculturaliteit, Christian Dupont, mei 2005' (Commission for Intercultural Dialogue. Final report and testimonies. Presented to the Minister of Equal Opportunities, Social Integration and Interculturality, Christian Dupont, May 2005), ed. E. Delruelle and R. Torfs [ www.intercultureledialoog.be].
• Costa Lascoux, J. (2004) `The French Republican Model and Concept of Secularity', paper presented at Beyond the Veil. Islam and Minorities in Belgium. Challenges and Opportunities of a Multicultural Society, 30 April, Brussels [http://www.kbs-frb.be].
• Court of Appeal, Antwerp (2005) `Hof van Beroep te Antwerpen', 14 June [http://www.diversiteit.be ].
• Dala, N. (2005) Als sluiers vallen. Vrouwenportretten (When veils fall: Portraits of women). Antwerpen: Uitgeverij Houtekiet.
• De Hert, P. and K. Meerschaut, eds (2007) Scheiding van Kerk en Staat of Actief Pluralisme? Een benadering vanuit de mensenrechten (Separation of church and state or active pluralism? A human rights approach). Antwerpen: Intersentia.
• De Meulenaere, Michel and Hugues Dorzee (2007) `Société Légaux et pertinents, les règlements d'ordre intérieur? Une étude critique: Ces règlements scolaires à peine voilés', Le Soir, 23 June, pp. 2-3.
• De Standaard (2003) `Hoofddoek verboden' (Headscarf forbidden), De Standaard, 8 September 2003, p. 2.
• Dewael, P. (2004) `Elke dwang tot sluieren is onaanvaardbaar' (Forced veiling is unacceptable), De Morgen, 1 October, p. 11.
• Dustin, M. (2006) Gender Equality and Cultural Diversity: European Comparisons and Lessons. London: Gender Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science [http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/genderInstitute/NuffieldReport_final.pdf].
• El Guindi, F. (1999) Veil: Modesty, Privacy and Resistance. Oxford: Berg.
• Ezekiel, J. (2006) `French Dressing: Race, Gender and the Hijab Story', Feminist Studies 32(2): 256-78.
• GO! (2007) `Onderwijs van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap. Brochure zuurstof voor de toekomst, Gemeenschapsonderwijs' (Education of the Flemish Community: Oxygen for the future, community education) [http://www.gemeenschapsonderwijs.be/SiteCollectionDocuments/061661GMOMEMORANDUM.pdf ]
• Goethals, N. (1996) `De Islamitische hoofddoek: te nemen of te laten?' (The Islamic headscarf: To take or leave it?), in R. Doom (ed.) Tolerantie getolereerd? Islamitische en westerse opvattingen, pp. 149-63. Ghent: Mys & Breesch.
• Gole, N. (1997) The Forbidden Modern. Civilisation and Veiling. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
• Husson, J. (2005) `Le financement des cultes et de laïcité: comparaison internationale et perspectives' (The financing of cults and laïcité: International comparison and perspectives), in J. Husson (ed.) Actes du colloque organisé le 8 octobre 2004 à Namur par l'Observatoire des Relations Administratives entre les Cultes, la Laïcité organisée et l'Etat, le Centre Interuniversitaire de Formation Permanente aslb et Namur-Europe-Wallonie asbl Wamur. (Legal and judicious societies, regulations of internal order? A critical study: School regulations barely veiled), pp. 23-49.
• Laborde, C. (2005) `Secular Philosophy and Muslim Headscarves in Schools', The Journal of Political Philosophy 13(3): 305-29.[CrossRef]
• Mahmood, S. (2005) Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
• Martiniello, M. (2004) `The Many Dimensions of Belgian diversity', Canadian Diversity/Diversité Canadienne 3(2): 43-6.
• Stasi, B. (2003) Laïcité et République. Rapport de la Commission sur l'application du principe de laïcité dans la République remis au président de la République le 11 décembre 2003 (Report of the Commission for Reflection on the Application of the Principle of Laïcité in the Republic, presented to the President of the Republic, 11 December 2003). Paris, La Documentation Française.
• Stevaert, S. (2005) `De tolerantie voorbij' (`Beyond tolerance'), in S. Stevaert, J. De Zutter, S. Nimmegeers and H. Vanheeswijck (eds) Ander geloof. Naar een actief pluralisme in Vlaanderen, pp. 8-19. Leuven: Davidsfonds.
• Vanderwaeren, E. (2005) `Wat heet gelijkheid van vrouwen en mannen in islam?' (What does equality of women and men in Islam mean?), PSW-papers, Universiteit Antwerpen, 2.
• Van Dorsselaer, I. (2006) `Ni Putes Ni Soumises in Brussel', Brussel Deze Week, Brussel Nieuws, 2 December [http://www.brusselnieuws.be/artikels/stadsleven/ni-putes-ni-soumises-in-brussel ].
• Weil, P. (2005) La République et sa diversité. Immigration, intégration, discriminations (The republic and its diversity: Immigration, integration, discrimination). Paris: Editions du Seuil et La République des Idées.
• Winter, B. (2006) `Secularism aboard the Titanic: Feminists and the Debate over the Hijab in France', Feminist Studies 32(2): 279-98.

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Coene, G. Articles by Longman, C. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?